Your Ad Here
Showing posts with label Global etfs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global etfs. Show all posts

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Inflation Fears Weigh On ETFs, GLD,UUP,VGK,FXI

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) turned flat on Friday as investors reacted to fresh monetary tightening in China ahead of an eagerly-awaited Group of 20 finance meeting in Paris.

  • After high-profile pledges to shake up the world monetary system and address the roots of the financial crisis, France has set seemingly modest goals for the two-day meeting of Group of 20 finance ministers and central bankers that begins Friday, economists said. The technical focus of the meeting, the first since France last month took over the year-long rotating presidencies of both the Group of Eight industrialized nations and the G20 in January, belies rising tensions over the issue of global imbalances and currency issues, economists said. The PowerShares DB U.S. Dollar Index Bullish ETF (NYSEArca: UUP) is flat in early trading.

  • European stock markets edged lower Friday, with mining stocks under pressure after further tightening measures from China and bank stocks hit by profit-taking after recent gains. Joshua Raymond, market strategist at City Index, said the sector’s drop accelerated after China raised its reserve-requirement ratio, the second increase this year. “Whenever we’ve seen a move by China in their new tightening regime, there’s generally been a knee-jerk reaction in markets,” Raymond said. The Vanguard European ETF (NYSEArca: VGK) is flat in early trading.

  • China ordered its banks Friday to hold back more money as reserves in a new move to curb lending and cool a spike in inflation. Beijing is using a series of repeated, gradual hikes in interest rates and reserve levels to stanch a flood of lending that helped China rebound quickly from the global crisis but now is fueling pressure for prices to rise. Inflation is politically dangerous for China’s communist leaders because it erodes economic gains on which they base their claim to power. Poor families are hit hardest in a society where some spend up to half their incomes on food and millions have seen little benefit from three decades of economic reform. The iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 (NYSEArca: FXI) is up modestly at the open.

  • It’s a good day for metals. Gold rose and silver moved to a 30-year high, while palladium jumped to the highest price in almost 10 years on demand for precious metals to hedge against declines in other assets because of unrest in the Middle East. Gold bar and coin demand in the Middle East jumped 39% in the fourth quarter from a year earlier, according to World Gold Council figures released yesterday. “If you see violence, you would buy gold expecting that the domestics would buy gold,” said Peter Fertig, owner of Quantitative Commodity Research Ltd. in Hainburg, Germany. The SPDR Gold Shares ETF (NYSEArca: GLD) is trading flat on Friday.
Disclosure NONE. 

Friday, February 18, 2011

New Asia ETF - ASEA

The other day we were discussing ETFs focusing on the BRIC Region (Brazil, Russia, India and China), so it's only fitting that we talk about a different region today, the Association of South Eastern Asian Nations (ASEAN).

The ASEAN region consists of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. And if you want to invest in these regions as a whole, then you are only one new ETF away...
  • ASEA - Global X FTSE ASEAN 40 ETF
The new foreign ETF tracks the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index and consists of the top 40 largest companies in the ASEAN region. Some of the top industries represented in the fund are telecommunications (15%), industrials (15%) and consumer discretionary (10%).

So if this fund sounds like a fit for your portfolio, you may want to check it out. As of today's close it was trading around $15.19.

Disclosure None

retirement landscape and things look pretty darn dire

Take a quick survey of the retirement landscape and things look pretty darn dire. According to a survey conducted by Wells Fargo last month, the average American has managed to save a meager 7 percent of the amount they’d like to have in their Golden Years. That fact alone is bad enough. But what’s worse is that I think even their “ideal” amount is WAY too low!

The average “middle class” survey respondent said they would need $300,000 to fund their retirement. Keep in mind, this is how Wells Fargo defined “middle class” …
  • Ages 30 to 69: Household income between $40,000 and $100,000 or investable assets of $25,000 and $100,000
  • Ages 25 to 29: Household income or investable assets between $25,000 and $100,000
If we take the median of this definition, we get a household making about $70,000 a year and with a nest egg worth $62,000 or so.

Let’s imagine there are two adults in the home, roughly 50 years old each based on this survey.
Even if they’re not carrying any serious debt, they haven’t managed to save anywhere near their targeted amount … so it’s safe to say they’re spending almost all of their annual income as it comes in.

Now, are they likely to slash their expenditures as they continue to age? And is it reasonable for them to expect health care costs, energy prices, and food bills to stay what they are today?

I’d say no to both of those questions. Yet even their magical target of a $300,000 nest egg represents just a bit more than four years of their current expenditures.

No wonder one in every three respondents also said they will have to keep working during their golden years to support themselves! I’m probably preaching to the choir here, and I’m sure you’re in much better shape than the typical American retiree-to-be. At the same time, I think it’s fair to say that there’s no such thing as being TOO prepared or having a nest egg that’s TOO big. Which is why I want to give you …

Four Simple Steps to a Richer Retirement Nest Egg, Whether You’re Already Ahead or Trying to Play Catch-Up

It doesn’t matter what age you are right now … how much you’ve already saved … or how far away from your goals you are right now. You absolutely want to make sure that you’ve got a plan in place, and that you’re sticking to it.  And the following four basic steps are a great starting point for building a better retirement nest egg without sacrificing safety …

Step #1: Before you do anything else, make sure you have a safe, liquid emergency cash fund.
 
Sure, I encourage 401(k) participants to at least contribute enough to get the maximum company match. And yes, I implore people to take maximum advantage of other tax shelters like IRAs, too.
But I don’t think anyone should be retirement rich and cash poor!

It simply doesn’t make sense to plow your money into long-term accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs if there’s a chance you may have to withdraw those same funds in short order in the event of an emergency. Not only will you likely be invested in less liquid investments but you could possibly face additional taxes and penalties, too.

So you absolutely want to make sure you have a solid emergency fund in place before you contribute another penny to your retirement nest egg.

Ideally, it will represent a full years’ worth of your current expenses or income but I would recommend three months as the bare minimum.

And even though you’ll get near-zero returns, I suggest keeping your emergency funds in a plain vanilla savings account, Treasury-only money market fund, or similar cash equivalent.
After all, the goal here is maximum safety and liquidity. You never know when you or a family member might need money due to a job loss, illness or busted water heater!

Once you have your liquid fund in place, of course, it’s time to start investing the rest of your nest egg for maximum income and growth …

Step #2: For your U.S. investments, stick mostly to conservative dividend-paying stocks right now.
I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: With interest rates still near record lows, most bonds, CDs, and money market funds simply aren’t paying enough to warrant owning them in your long-term investment accounts.

Plus, given the fiscal mess here in this country — at the federal, state and local levels! — there is a substantial risk of further losses for many government bondholders going forward.
So if you want the biggest, safest yields here in the U.S., I continue to think conservative dividend shares represent your best option.

As I’ve pointed out time and again — these types of investments not only kick off stable, growing cash streams … they also offer you the chance for long-term investment gains, too.
And even if you don’t to go about picking individual companies, you can always own a broad swath of solid income stocks through vehicles like the PowerShares Dividend Achievers (NYSE:PFM) exchange-traded fund.

Step #3: Add some foreign dividend shares, too.

It’s no longer enough for us to invest solely in the U.S. — the world is becoming a smaller and smaller place … some economies overseas are expanding at much faster rates than those in the traditional places … and it’s getting more important to diversify your portfolio as much as possible.
This is precisely why I’ve been recommending select foreign dividend stocks even for my own father’s retirement account!

By holding the U.S.-listed shares of foreign corporations you can quickly and easily access new worlds of growth.

Better yet, because your shares (and dividends) are originally priced in foreign currencies, you have the unique opportunity to profit further whenever the U.S. dollar moves lower relative to the listing company’s home currency.

Again, there are even exchange-traded funds that will give you all-in-one-shot access to these global dividend stocks — including the S&P International Dividend ETF (NYSE:DWX).
And that brings me to a bigger point …

Step #4: Learn all you can about other alternative investments and strategies, too!
It’s important to stay on top of the latest investments that are becoming available … especially if you’re looking for unique new ways to hedge your traditional holdings or for new vehicles to use in the more aggressive part of your portfolio.

Disclosure None

China's Serious Coal Problem

Chinese President Hu Jintao meets with President Obama today in Washington DC. The two presidents are supposed to have a private lunch and then discuss a variety of topics including trade, military, North Korea, Iran, human rights, the dollar, the yuan and the weather, no doubt.

As the east coast is being hammered with a wintry mix of sleet, freezing rain, snow and ice, you might expect the topic of coal to come up. After all, a majority of electricity in the United States and China is provided by coal. And for the past few years, China has started to import coal -- mostly from Australia.
As a result, China's domestic coal companies are practically minting money. They can't produce coal fast enough, because no matter how much coal they bring to market, there's a near-guarantee that they'll be able to sell it for top dollar.

They don't have to worry about anything except for increasing production. And now, with floods in Australia, the amount of coal being shipped to China has decreased substantially. Coal prices have responded favorably -- rising from $89 per metric ton up to over $120 per metric ton -- with no signs of stopping:

It's been a year since my boss, Ian Wyatt, recommended one small Chinese coal company to subscribers of his research service Energy World Profits.  And folks who bought this company when he recommended it are now sitting on 81% gains.

Today, Ian still targets an even higher price for this company -- and it's still a buy.
I'm talking about Puda Coal(PUDA_).

A lack of Australian coal puts this company in an even better position. Even when Australian coal production resumes, the market will have to play catch up. There's no substitute for coal in China, and they've been increasing their imports.

So my recommendation would be to buy Chinese coal companies like Puda -- with domestic production. Even if China's coal demand is reduced by half, they'll still need to tap into their domestic supply. It's relatively cheaper than Australian coal, it's readily available and it's extremely important to China's growth and sustainability.

I'd recommend picking up shares of Puda under $20. That's about a 50% upside from today's price.


Disclosure None

Emerging Market ETFs: VWO Takes the Lead

There’s a new leader in the battle of the emerging market exchange traded funds (ETFs).

On Jan. 18, the iShares MSCI Emerging Index Fund (NYSEArca: EEM) dropped to $46.36 billion in assets while Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEArca: VWO), which rolled out two years fter EEM, hit $46.47 billion in assets, reports Olivier Ludwig for IndexUniverse. VWO was also the most popular U.S.-listed ETF in 2010, bringing in $19.34 billion.

Two reasons are attributed to VWO’s gain to fame. VWO has an expense ratio of 0.27%, as compared to EEM’s expense ratio of 0.69%. While both EEM and VWO are based MSCI Emerging Markets Index, which returned about 20% over the last year, VWO performed at 18%, whereas EEM returned 15.5%.

VWO uses a replication strategy that holds more securities than EEM to better mimic the underlying index. Still, EEM traders enjoy using the fund due to its turnovers. For instance, EEM had turnover of $726.66 billion last year alone, compared to $164.54 billion for VWO, which suggests that VWO attracts greater buy-and-hold investors.

Other notable broad emerging market ETFs include:
  • SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEArca: GMM), which has $237.8 million in assets and a 0.59% expense ratio.
  • Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NYSEArca: SCHE), which has $312.9 million in assets and an expense ratio of 0.25%.
  • PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio (NYSEArca: PXH), which has $543.5 million in assets and an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Disclosure I am long VWO shares.

4 Reasons to Consider Global Real Estate ETFs

In this day and age, if you want to maximize your portfolio, you’ll diversify with global assets and exchange traded funds (ETFs), and international real estate market is no exception.

Investors should have learned three lessons from our economic upheaval: Bubbles pop, a broad-economic downturn will affect a diversified portfolio and the after effects of a recession will linger, remarks Andy Hyltin for Advisor One.

In an attempt to find new ways to manage and minimize risk, advisors are looking to global real estate investments. By combining U.S. and international real estate in portfolio, an investor may be better able to minimize risk while maximizing returns.

Going abroad may prove beneficial for a number of reasons:
  • Diversify. Going international means exposure to assets with lower correlations to the U.S. economy.
  • Opportunities. The U.S. real estate market is only a portion of the world’s commercial real estate market. The Prudential Real Estate Investors stated that U.S./Canada commercial real estate market was 30.2% of the global market in 2008, and the U.S./Canada share is projected to diminish to 26% by 2028.
  • Emerging markets. The emerging markets will likely continue to grow faster than the matured, developed economies, which will also drive commercial real estate growth in the developing markets.
  • Inflation hedge. Real estate, like other physical assets, could provide some protection against inflation.
There are several options if you’re looking at this market, but to see and analyze them all, drop by the ETF Analyzer. There are some significant differences between the available funds, and the differences can range from cost, country exposure and constituent weightings:
  • First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Real Estate Index Fund (NYSEArca: FFR): FFR holds a large amount of the United States at 34.6%, making it the largest country in this fund. Hong Kong and Japan also have significant weights, which may give you some good exposure to the booming Asian market with a little U.S. diversification for good measure.
  • SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (NYSEArca: RWX): Japan, Australia and Hong Kong are the main countries here, but there’s also a fair amount of Europe exposure, too.
  • WisdomTree International Real Estate Fund (NYSEArca: DRW): Hong Kong, Australia, Japan and France round up the top four countries in this fund, which has about 40 more holdings that RWX for some added diversification.
  • Guggenheim China Real Estate ETF (NYSEArca: TAO): TAO is an example of single-country real estate market exposure…or is it? Hong Kong actually accounts for 72% of the ETF, while China makes up 26.9%.
Disclosure I am long RWX shares.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Vanguard Rolls Out Cheapest Global ETF

Vanguard today launched the least expensive international, non-U.S. equity ETF that is almost identical to another fund it already offers. That makes it part of the Valley Forge, Pa.-based company’s strategy to cater to brand loyalty among investors by offering complete families of similar products, each with its own set of indexes.

The launch of the Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (NYSEArca: VXUS), which comes at a time of heightened interest among U.S. investors in non-U.S. companies,  also brings Vanguard into direct competition with iShares, which offers an identical product to VXUS that uses the same index, the MSCI All Country World Index ex USA.

Vanguard’s VXUS has an annual expense ratio of 0.20 percent, less than both the 0.35 percent BlackRock charges on its iShares MSCI ACWI ex US Index Fund (NasdaqGM: ACWX) and the 0.25 percent cost of the Vanguard FTSE All World ex-U.S. ETF (NYSEArca: VEU).

Vanguard’s low costs are at the core of the company’s fast growth. It led ETF providers in net inflows in 2010, attracting about $40 billion in new investment dollars last year. Last week, its Vanguard MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEArca: VWO) became the world’s largest emerging markets fund, surpassing its BlackRock-sponsored counterpart, the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (NYSEArca: EEM). VWO costs 0.27 percent, while EEM costs 0.69 percent.

The new ETF is designed to be a separate share class of Vanguard’s Total International Stock Index Fund, the company’s second-largest international index fund, with $51.4 billion in net assets.

“VXUS is a new way to invest in an established fund that offers broad international diversification with an extremely modest price tag,” Vanguard’s Chief Investment Officer Gus Sauter said in a press release. “It complements our Total Stock Market ETF and Total Bond Market ETF.”

VXUS Vs. VEU

VXUS tracks the MSCI All Country World ex U.S. Investable Market Index, a benchmark comprising more than 6,000 securities in 44 countries of companies in all tiers of market capitalization, the company added in the release.

VEU, an ETF with $6.95 billion in assets as of Jan. 27, was launched in March 2007 and tracks the FTSE All-World ex US Index, an index similar in construction to the MSCI benchmark behind VXUS, but that has a smaller portfolio and excludes small caps.
 
VXUS has more than 43 percent of its portfolio allocated to Europe, and some 25 percent of the portfolio tied to emerging markets and to Pacific nations, respectively.

The remainder is allocated to North America, namely Canada. VEU’s allocation distribution is roughly the same, according to Vanguard’s most recent data on its website. All in all, the new fund covers 98 percent of the world’s markets, excluding the U.S.

Vanguard’s Growing Reputation

Vanguard has also emerged as a top pick among investors and advisors alike, according to different surveys conducted by Cambridge, Mass.-based business consultancy Cogent Research in recent months in a trend the company concluded reflects investors’ growing recognition of Vanguard’s value proposition.

Vanguard has nearly $150 billion of assets under management in its ETFs. It’s the third largest ETF sponsor in the world, behind BlackRock and State Street Global Advisors, which have around $448 billion and $247 billion in assets, respectively, according to data compiled by IndexUniverse.com.

Disclosure I am long VWO shares.